Why Engines are Commonly Measured in Horsepower
We owe the “horsepower” unit of engine power measurement to Scottish engineer James
Watt. In the early 1780s, after making a vastly
superior steam engine to the then classic Newcomen steam engine, Watt was looking for
a way to market his invention, advertising the fact that his engine used about 75% less
fuel than a similarly powered Newcomen, among many other improvements.
At first, he tried selling his engine on a royalty scheme, where the customers would
owe him one-third of the money they saved by using his engine over other steam engines.
Of course, many at the time used horses, not steam engines, so it was difficult to compare
without them actually buying the engine to see how it would perform for their particular
usage. Thus, he scrapped the royalty scheme and decided to try a different tact to convince
people to buy his engine. Ever the inventor, his solution was to come
up with a new unit of measurement that those in need of his engine understood -horse power,
referring to powerful draft horses. Thus, he set about determining how much power
a typical draft horse could generate. It isn’t known exactly how he came up with the numbers
he did, as there are conflicting accounts of the experiments he ran. But after doing
those experiments, he figured out a typical draft horse could do about 32,400 foot-pounds
of work in 60 seconds and maintain that power rate for a good long workday. He then rounded
up, going with 33,000 foot-pounds per minute for 1 horsepower.
So, in other words, by his estimation a good draft horse could lift 33,000 pounds of material
1 foot in 1 minute or 3,300 pounds of material 10 feet in one minute, etc .
In truth, that’s a very generous estimate as very few horses could maintain that kind
of power for a full workday, but getting a perfect figure wasn’t that important to
what Watt was trying to do. Further, by overestimating what a horse could do, whether intentionally
or not, he made sure that his product would always over deliver what he said when trying
to get people to buy it, which is a great word-of-mouth marketing trick.
In the end, Watt’s engine was revolutionary and played a huge role in the Industrial Revolution.
Thanks to this fact, his unit of measure of an engine’s power, horsepower, also became
popular. Funny enough, today the SI unit of power, the Watt, which was named in homage
to James Watt, has widely come to replace “horsepower” in most applications.
Bonus Fact: While Watt came up with the exact measurement
of what would become “horsepower,” he was not the first to propose the idea of equating
a steam engine’s power to a horse’s. The first documented instance of this was suggested
by British inventor Thomas Savery who wrote the following in a letter in 1702:
“So that an engine which will raise as much water as two horses, working together at one
time in such a work, can do, and for which there must be constantly kept ten or twelve
horses for doing the same. Then I say, such an engine may be made large enough to do the
work required in employing eight, ten, fifteen, or twenty horses to be constantly maintained
and kept for doing such